Today we're going to dive into something that might seem obvious at first but is actually quite profound when you really think about it. We're going to explore what science actually is.
What Comes to Mind When You Hear "Science"?
I want you to think for a moment. When I say the word "science," what's the first image that pops into your head? Laboratory equipment? Someone in a white coat mixing chemicals? Maybe Einstein with his wild hair scribbling equations on a blackboard?
These are all part of the picture, certainly, but they're just the surface. In this course, we need to dig deeper and ask ourselves a more fundamental question: What exactly IS science? And why should you, regardless of your major, care about understanding it?
Defining Science: More Than Just Facts
Let me start with a story. A few years ago, I was talking to my neighbor who insisted that eating honey could cure his arthritis. When I asked him how he knew this, he said his grandmother told him, and she lived to be 95. Now, his grandmother may indeed have lived a long life, but is this science?
This brings us to our first important point. Science isn't just a collection of random facts or things people believe to be true. It's something much more systematic and rigorous.
At its core, science is a way of thinking about and investigating the world around us. It's a method we use to understand how things work, why they happen, and what we can predict about future events. Think of it as humanity's most reliable tool for separating what's actually true from what we might wish were true or what seems true at first glance.
Most scientists would agree that science has three main components. First, it's a body of knowledge - all those facts, principles, and theories we've accumulated over centuries of investigation. Second, it's a process - a systematic way of asking questions and finding answers. And third, everything in science must be based on evidence that we can observe, measure, and verify.
So here's a working definition we'll use throughout this course: Science is the systematic study of the natural world through careful observation, controlled experimentation, and logical reasoning.
The Hallmarks of Scientific Thinking
Now, what makes science different from other ways of understanding the world? Let me walk you through five key characteristics that set science apart.
First, science is empirical. This means everything must be based on what we can actually observe and measure. You can't just sit in your armchair and reason your way to scientific knowledge - you have to get out there and look at the world, collect data, make measurements.
Second, scientific ideas must be testable. If I propose that invisible fairies control the weather, that might be an interesting idea, but if there's no way to test it, it's not science. Scientific claims have to be stated in ways that allow us to design experiments or make observations that could potentially prove them wrong.
Third, scientific results must be reproducible. If I claim to have discovered something important, other scientists should be able to repeat my work and get the same results. This is crucial because it protects us from errors, fraud, and the kind of wishful thinking that can creep into any human endeavor.
Fourth, scientific knowledge is tentative. This might surprise you. We often think of science as providing absolute truth, but actually, scientific knowledge is always open to revision when new evidence comes along. This isn't a weakness - it's actually one of science's greatest strengths. It means science can correct its mistakes and improve over time.
Finally, science strives to be objective. Scientists are human beings with biases, emotions, and preconceptions just like everyone else. But the scientific method is designed to minimize these human failings by relying on data rather than personal opinions or cultural beliefs.
Let me give you a concrete example. Suppose someone claims that a particular herbal remedy can cure headaches. The scientific approach would ask: Can we test this? Can we design a controlled experiment where some people get the herb and others get a placebo, without anyone knowing which is which? Can other researchers repeat this test and get similar results? If the answer to these questions is yes, then we're dealing with science.
Science Among Other Ways of Knowing
Now, I want to be clear about something important. Science is not the only way humans seek to understand the world and their place in it. We also have religion, philosophy, art, literature, and personal experience. Each of these has its own value and its own domain.
The key is understanding where science fits in this larger picture. Science limits itself to questions about the natural, observable world. It asks "what" and "how" questions. What causes disease? How do planets move? How do living things evolve over time?
Science is remarkably good at answering these types of questions, but it deliberately stays away from other important questions that humans care about. Questions like "What is the meaning of life?" or "What should I value most?" or "Is there a God?" These are profound and important questions, but they're not scientific questions because they can't be answered through observation and experimentation.
Let me give you an example that's relevant to many of your lives. Science can tell us a great deal about malaria - it's caused by Plasmodium parasites that are transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes. We can study the parasite's life cycle, develop drugs to treat the disease, and design strategies to control mosquito populations. But science cannot tell us whether it's morally right or wrong to spend billions of dollars on malaria research while other problems go unsolved. That's a question of values and ethics, not empirical investigation.
How Scientific Knowledge Is Organized
As we build scientific understanding, we organize it into several different categories, and it's important that you understand the differences between them.
At the most basic level, we have scientific facts. These are observations that have been confirmed so many times that we consider them reliable. For example, pure water boils at 100 degrees Celsius at sea level pressure. We've measured this thousands of times, and it's always the same result.
Then we have scientific laws. These describe patterns in nature that appear to be universal. Newton's law of gravity, for instance, describes how objects attract each other. It doesn't explain why gravity works the way it does, but it accurately describes what happens.
Scientific theories are different - and this is crucial to understand because the word "theory" means something very different in science than it does in everyday conversation. In everyday language, when we say "that's just a theory," we mean it's just a guess or speculation. But in science, a theory is a comprehensive explanation for a wide range of observations. The theory of evolution, the theory of relativity, the germ theory of disease - these aren't guesses. They're robust explanations supported by vast amounts of evidence.
Finally, we have hypotheses - these are testable predictions that we make based on our current understanding. A hypothesis might be proven right or wrong by experiment, and either outcome teaches us something valuable.
The Limitations of Science
Now, as powerful as science is, we need to be honest about its limitations. Science is a human endeavor, and like all human endeavors, it has boundaries and imperfections.
First, there are ethical limits. There are experiments we simply cannot and should not do. We can't intentionally expose people to dangerous diseases to study their effects. We can't manipulate children's environments to see how it affects their development. These ethical boundaries sometimes limit what we can study directly.
Second, science is limited by its subject matter. As I mentioned earlier, science deals with the natural, observable world. It cannot answer questions about meaning, purpose, values, or the supernatural.
Third, scientists are human beings, and human beings have biases. Even with the best intentions, personal beliefs, cultural backgrounds, and financial interests can influence how research is conducted and interpreted. The scientific method helps minimize these problems, but it doesn't eliminate them entirely.
Finally, science is limited by our current technology and methods. We can only study what our instruments can measure. There may be aspects of reality that are currently beyond our ability to investigate.
Why This Matters to You
You might be wondering, "Why do I need to understand all this? I'm not going to be a scientist." Let me tell you why this matters, regardless of your career path.
First, we live in a world where scientific and technological issues affect our daily lives. Climate change, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, medical treatments - these are all areas where scientific understanding informs important decisions. As citizens and professionals, you need to be able to evaluate scientific claims and understand how scientific knowledge is developed.
Second, understanding science helps you think more clearly about all kinds of problems. The scientific approach - asking for evidence, looking for patterns, testing ideas, being willing to change your mind when faced with new information - these are valuable skills in any field.
Third, in your professional life, you'll likely encounter situations where you need to make decisions based on incomplete information, evaluate competing claims, or solve complex problems. The scientific approach provides a framework for tackling these challenges systematically and effectively.
Finally, science is one of humanity's great intellectual achievements. Understanding how it works gives you insight into one of the most powerful ways humans have developed for understanding reality. That's valuable knowledge in its own right.
Let's Test Your Understanding
Before we wrap up today, let me pose a few questions to check whether these concepts are clear.
First, what does it mean when we say science is "empirical"? Can anyone give me an example of how this principle might apply to evaluating a health claim you see on social media?
Second, why is reproducibility so important in science? What would happen to our confidence in scientific knowledge if results couldn't be replicated?
Similar article
- Learn the basics of scientific theories in GST 105
- Step-by-step guide to the scientific method
- Download GST 105 handout, outline, and summary notes
- History and philosophy of science – course note 2
- GST 105 lecture note on laws of nature
- Explore more free university courses
- Practice GST 105 CBT questions and answers
Third, can someone give me an example of a scientific theory and explain why it's more than just a guess or opinion?
Think about these questions, and we'll discuss them next time. In our next class, we'll explore the scientific method in more detail and look at how scientists actually go about investigating questions and building knowledge.
Remember, science isn't just about memorizing facts - it's about developing a way of thinking that will serve you well throughout your lives, whatever paths you choose to follow.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Okebukola, P. A. O. (2002). Beyond the stereotype to new trajectories in science teaching. UNESCO.
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge Classics.